June 28th, 2009 at 7:57 am (Information)
The Information: Interactions and Impact conference ran from 22-25 June – three half days and a full day. I attended the following sessions:
- Knowing and learning in organizations: Information and the enactment of
meaning, knowledge and decisions (Keynote address)
- Teachersâ€™ Conceptions of Teaching and Learning in the Context of a School Library Project. A Follow-up Study in the City of Oulu, Finland
- Students requests for help and the teacherâ€™s strategies of support in a secondary school classroom working on a research assignment
- Complexity, coherence, constraint, cognition & context (Keynote address)
- Students, question formulation and the issues of transfer
- Information Seeking Behaviour of Computer Science and Information Technology Undergraduates
- Dealing with Web 2.0 genre: How do competitive intelligence professionals assess online sources’ credibility?
- The Information Behaviour of an Information Provider: A Sequential Mixed Methods Study
- Like an open book? A student-centred view of e-books and a new model for delivery
- King Saud University Female Studentsâ€™ use and perspective of Online Communication
- Information Literacies beyond rhetoric: developing research and practice between the intersection of information seeking and learning (keynote address)
- Formal learning in an informal setting: investigating the student learning journey
- Optimizing Studentsâ€™ Information Interactions through Mediation Experiences
- Information Literacy Training for Postgrad and Postdoc Researchers: a National Survey and its International Implications
- Making a difference? Assessment of Information Literacy Education at LinkÃ¶ping University Library
(Unfortunately I had to miss Michael’s paper on Theatre Professionals, as it clashed with another paper that seemed particularly relevant to my current role.)
Probably the paper I enjoyed most was Complexity, coherence, constraint, cognition & context, by Dave Snowden. Most of what he said wasn’t devastatingly new (e.g. if you are looking for something you will probably fail to notice other stuff, even if it is really obvious) but he delivered it very well, with lots of engaging stories to prove his points. And it was really refreshing to hear someone with high-level corporate experience talk about management strategies, etc, and say that they are basically bulls**t. He has put the slides, and a podcast of the talk, up on his website – it probably would have been more effective to combine them into a vodcast (particularly since one of the slides included video) but I guess that would have been more time consuming to organise.
There were no real standouts in the other papers (though I was a bit chuffed when the first keynote used the Challenger and Columbia disasters to illustrate a point, since we had used the exact same stories as one of our case studies in the Risk Management training). I’d had high hopes of the paper on eBooks, but in the end it didn’t really tell me much I didn’t already know, though it was nevertheless useful to see that current studies are still confirming certain generally accepted truths.
At one point, I was talking to someone who said that he was a bit tired of seemingly endless case studies that don’t really seem to be generalisable. I’m a bit inclined to agree with this – particularly since in many cases they also don’t seem to be able to be turned into specific practices either. They were not uninteresting, but I’m not sure how much theoretical relevance, or practical applicability, they had outside the world of the case study.
But having said this, learning about some of the contexts in which the case studies took place was fascinating – e.g. the arrangements at King Saud University (gender segregaged campuses), the way health information is collected in Scotland, setting up school libraries in Finland, how information literacy is assessed in a particular course at LinkÃ¶ping University.
As well as the papers, there were other conferency events – a Civic Reception at the Townhouse, a half day trip to a Crathes Castle, and the Conference Dinner. The Castle was quite small, but not uninteresting, and the gardens were lovely. The food offered at the dinner was good, but not enormously to my taste (though I learned that even if there only seems to be one dessert on offer, if you ask you may be able to get an amended version of it – in this case non-alcoholic – which was nice). The entertainment consisted of a group of three violins and a keyboard playing mostly traditional Scottish music (the keyboard player was so into it, he was practically dancing while sitting down) and an a cappella singer – both thoroughly enjoyable.
Finally, the other key point of a successful conference is who you talk to, and in this case I met some very interesting people. So all in all, the good very much outweighed the not-quite-so-good. It was definitely a worthwhile and enjoyable experience.